The Virtual Edge Community

Don’t Miss Cisco Live Virtual 2010—It Promises to be Another Ground Breaking Hybrid Event

Cisco Live, the technology company’s mixed physical and virtual event is scheduled to open June 27 at the Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas and run through July 1. Dannette Veale, Cisco Live’s Global Virtual Strategist expects virtual attendance to reach more than 6,000 between attendees participating via uStream, Cisco Live’s Facebook page and Cisco Live’s 3D interactive virtual environment (on the InXpo platform). All this while physical attendance at the event is growing and will also be well ahead of last year. 


Veale sees the event as a vital component in the overall sales strategy for Cisco and this year Cisco Live is introducing local Cisco office events. “Our sales people see this as a great opportunity to be able to bring their customers in for a day,” she says, “if not the entire three days, and get time with them in a way that they don’t normally get by really creating an event structure, a mini event if you will, at their local sales office.” Cisco will be hosting several satellite events that will be connected to the main Las Vegas event through the virtual event platform. The satellite events will be held in conference rooms and can access content from on-demand technical sessions as well as live elements such as keynotes, executive chats and panel discussions.


While certain keynotes, chats and super sessions will be broadcast over uStream, Cisco will also utilize ON24’s streaming and capture platform for other sessions aired over Cisco Live’s virtual environment. One change this year will be in turn-around time for captured video. Cisco plans to capture about 140 recorded sessions, but in a real time format which will reduce

post-production time from 2 or 3 weeks to 72 hours. The benefits of this fast turnaround are numerous—sessions are much more immediate and post-event communications can be done in a more timely fashion. “We don’t have to wait,” says Veale. “That’s the big thing for our attendees; we don’t have to hold the thank-you-for-attending message to two to three weeks post-event.  We can actually get it out the week after the event now.  And that’s one of the huge wins for us.” Attendees will have access to the session content virtually as soon as they get back to their offices.


The exhibitor presence at this year’s Cisco Live Virtual will be even larger than last year’s with a combination of internal and external exhibitors. Another innovation for 2010, several of the exhibitors this year, including CA/NetQoS and Fluke Networks, will be broadcasting live from the physical event directly back to the virtual audience. Other noteworthy events on the agenda

will be keynotes from Cisco Chairman and CEO John Chambers and CTO Padmasree Warrior as well as a variety of technical seminars.


Another new element being introduced this year involves gaming. Cisco has recently released a new game to be incorporated into its event: Cisco Colossal Cranium Challenge, a trivia-based game built around Cisco history and leadership with a few pop culture references thrown in for good measure. Attendees can play solo or as part of a team and view their overall standing on a leader board. A second game, Cisco Jargon Jumble—to be released June 18—requires players to unscramble letters to discover hidden Cisco technology terms. Both games will be elements of an overall strategy to increase attendee engagement and interest (prizes will be awarded to the winners, for example).


For anyone in technology, Cisco Live is a must attend but if you aren’t in tech but are doing or thinking about producing virtual events or hybrid events, Cisco Live Virtual is a must attend for you as well. As we’ve reported on Virtual Edge before, this hybrid event won one of the top marketing awards in the industry (actually two)—with a B2B marketing event beating out consumer marketers for the first time ever. Make your calendar for June 29- July 1 and register at www.ciscolivevirtual.com.  


Tags: CA, Cisco, Fluke Networks, InXpo, ON24, UStream., cisco live virtual

Views: 13

Comment on This

Replies to This Item

I am very excited about the success that Cisco is having with their virtual event and in no way want to diminish this, but I do need to point out, as a developer of a true 3D Virtual platform, it is a stretch to be describing the InXpo platform as a 3D Interactive Virtual Environment. Unless something has changed from when I last experienced their platform, it is just not a 3D Environment.
This is a very important distinction as these technologies move forward. Meeting planners that are considering running virtual and Hybrid events are confused enough with all of the options, never mind when platforms are called something they are not.
Many are calling these platforms psuedo 3D, but even that is not correct. Your either offering an immersive 3D environment or your not. Data is being published on a daily basis that discusses the way our brains absorb and engage in these 3D immersive environments and the results that one sees when using these environments is completely different then the way our brains react to a flat 2D reproduction of a 3D environment.
As an industry, lets be sure that we help those who are trying to understand the advantages of these technologies and how they can benefit by using these technologies by at least calling them what they are and not misleading those who are not familiar with the difference.
Good luck Cisco and thank you for leading all of us down such an important path of online engagement.
James: I agree that INXPO is not a true 3D virtual platform today. We may look to add true 3D immersive components into the platform over time, to address specific client use cases (e.g. demonstration of a complex product for a B2B setting). Anything we do, however, must keep scalability and ease of use in mind.

Some use-cases of virtual events will have thousands (if not tens of thousands) of simultaneous users and the technology needs to support that volume seamlessly. In addition to scalability, "barriers to use" are important - if immersive technology requires a software download, then you'll always have some users (especially in a corporate setting) that are left out.

In addition, my feeling on 3D immersive is that it ought to be applied for the right use-case and doesn't necessarily need to be "always on". In many of the virtual events I've worked on, attendees want to get in, get the information they need and get on their way. In this scenario, 2D may be fine - and perhaps more efficient.

Don't get me wrong - I'm a believer in 3D - when it makes sense. I'd be interested in your thoughts.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

© 2013   Created by Michael Doyle.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service